Why does God allow suffering? He can do anything, so he could give us free will but still not have suffering.
Right?
Possible answers (for a future article?):
There may well be a lot of truth in this. I believe that God is all-powerful; but I think that some ways of explaining what that means don't make sense, or aren't true of the Christian God. For instance 'God is all-powerful, therefore he can lie' is not right in Christianity. Neither, I think, is 'God is all-powerful, therefore he can make 2+2=3'. God can't lie; he can't do things that are against his character. He can't alter logic; again, logic is part of his character. A way of explaining what we as Christians mean by 'God is all-powerful' is 'God can do whatever he wants'. It may be that, if you create things like us, and we choose to sin, it's logically impossible that we don't suffer. God is all-powerful, but some suffering has to happen. This may not be right - it's just a guess, but it seems consistent with the picture we're given in the Bible of an all-powerful, suffering God.
> I would like to agree and add the point that I can do many things such as lying > and all other sins but this does not make me more powerful than God. As > far as I can see, it shows how much weaker I am. ~
Of course, on the "God cannot lie" issue - if God is incapable of lieing, why bother thanking him for not lieing? Perhaps he could lie, but has chosen not to - that would make him worth thanking.
I think praising God for His character (including His faithfulness, or not lying if you prefer) is well-justified by CS Lewis's idea: "I think we delight to praise what we enjoy because the praise not merely expresses but completes the enjoyment; it is its appointed consummation. It is not out of compliment that lovers keep on telling one another how beautiful they are; the delight is incomplete till it is expressed." (in 'Reflections on the Psalms')
> This is so right. ~
There may well be a lot of truth in this too. I believe that God is all-knowing, and outside of time - so he did know what bad consequences for him and for us would occur if he made the world. I don't really understand why he'd still go ahead and do it, but presume that it's because he judges the final outcome to be worth it.
One way of looking at the final outcome is that he has some real friends who chose to be his friends. Also we get real friends in him and in other people. If we think this is what God was doing all this for it makes you really value your friends, right?
I do find it hard to believe this answer. We see many times in the Bible when God does step in and act to rescue people from terrible circumstances; so when he doesn't, he is 'allowing' suffering in some way. The suffering may come from the hands of other people, but God isn't striking those people down - so at some level he is allowing it.
Of course the suffering on earth is nothing like as harsh as the judgement, so in a way if we can accept that maybe we can accept this world too?
Add to this the combined suffering of all the people he loves more than we ever can. How does it make you feel when someone you love suffers?
I think it's very much related (I was too lazy to start writing about it the other day, and I find it too horrible to think about most of the time). I believe in hell, but I think it's appropriate that it's the thing I find most unpleasant and disturbing to talk about; I think that's probably how God feels about it, too. If we're to discuss it, perhaps we need a linked page, as there's probably a lot to say? WhatDoYouThinkAboutHell
Yes maybe some of the answer is that God is changing us through suffering. That is very hard to swallow sometimes though, isn't it?
It certainly is hard to swallow sometimes. But yes, I think this is an important piece in the jigsaw. eg Heb 12.5-11, James 1.2-4, 1 Pet 1.6-7, are very much on this theme.
The surprise is that God does allow his child, Christ, to suffer - and we share in his sufferings. So, while it would be very wrong for a human father to stand aside and let meaningless suffering happen to his child, it seems that God judges that it's right to let some suffering happen. Hard to understand, but again perhaps the Cross is at the heart of trying to figure out the meaning of suffering?
Some suffering is about learning though isn't it? I mean with children, if you deliberately cause them to suffer or if it's for no reason then that's not cool but no matter how much you love them, you can't keep them in a protective bubble and there comes a point when they have to learn for themselves that if they touch something hot it burns, or that if they climb up on something they're not supposed to climb on there's a good chance they'll fall off and it will hurt. Ok, that's on rather small scale compared to some of this stuff but thought the idea behind it made sense when I started writing...
What do you mean by this? - Not saving us as in not taking us to heaven, or not saving us as in not stopping our suffering?
Being outside time it must all seem very different to God. The nearest I can get to what I mean is that if I tell my friend's little girl she can't do something she wants to do until the evening, she thinks that's FOREVER and it really distresses her and is a huge deal. She is very little and doesn't really have much concept of time. Whereas for me, waiting a couple of hours isn't something that seems very long. And I'm not saying that that means He doesn't care about people's suffering.
If we have never sought, we seek thee now;
Thine eyes burn though the dark, our only stars;
We must have sight of thorn-marks on thy brow,
We must have thee, O Jesus of the scars.
The heavens frighten us; they are too calm;
In all the universe we have no place.
Our wounds are hurting us; where is the balm?
Lord Jesus, by thy scars we know thy grace.
If, when the doors are shut, thou drawest near,
Only reveal those hands, that side of thine;
We know today what wounds are, have no fear;
Show us thy scars, we know the countersign.
The other gods were strong, but thou wast weak;
They rode, but thou didst stumble to a throne;
But to our wounds only God's wounds can speak,
And not a god has wounds, but thou alone.
I kind of find it difficult that Jesus came willingly to go through all that and I complain about comparatively minor things in my life a whole lot more!
If you would like to read a complete load of utter bollocks on this topic try this page.
Mmm - off the topic slightly, but I'm not sure about the way he interprets Romans 8:
"For the creation was subjected to frustration, not by its own choice, but by the will of the one who subjected it {i.e. God halted its development until we are ready}, in hope that the creation itself will be liberated {i.e. planets transformed from undeveloped, dry, lifeless hulks to living, breathing ecosystems} from its bondage to decay and brought into the glorious freedom of the children of God."
Aren't the planets fine as they are? Anyway, enough about this website... which has also got an article called "Apostles In First-Century Britain?"...